Hi @carview1987 thanks for taking suggestions into consideration
For 3, although it may not affect the proposal itself, still want to remind that “unlock 13m PERP to be used for strategic partnerships” is a false statement. The proposal 245 unlocked 13m PERP for reward, 4m PERP for partnerships + bounties, and 4m PERP for DEX liquidity, and the 4m USDC weekly cap is just for the 13m PERP reward program. Besides, this proposal ( 904 ) didn’t mention it’s assuming “the tenure is 12 months” it would have more clarity if we could put it into the proposal or just simply remove the wrong statement.
For 4, it would be great if we could have an example instead of clarifying from replying comment, or just change the word “equally” to “proportionally”? Or any other word that could make it more precise
For 6, could you make this spreadsheet’s version history open to everyone? Ideally, we should export it to CSV and upload it to IPFS or Arweave to make it immutable but it should be fine by checking the edit history from the google sheet